Newspapers are dead.
Long live
newspapers.
So says John Oliver
– It is sad that it takes a comedian to tell everyone what they
pretty much already knew. People don't read newspapers – they
don't want to pay for what they can get for free off the Internet or
from the TV for basically nothing. (Actually they do pay for it
through their Internet subscription, cable or satellite bill, or
cell phone bill. They just think that it is free.)
But actual
investigative journalism about the issues that matter locally,
regionally, and nationally? Don't hold your breath. That costs
serious money. And people are more in tune to cute animal pictures
than things that can and will affect their lives.
Sad to say,
President Trump could happen because of the death of journalism and
media's need to make a profit to satisfy investors. Trump, who
spends next to nothing on campaign advertising is within 10 points of
Clinton who is spending tons on advertising. Trump knows how to
manipulate the media and Clinton is a wonk that has less ability to
connect with people than my pet rock. Or cats. Then again, all
they have to do to get attention is sit on your lap and you'll
scratch them. A Clinton campaign commercial comes on and the channel
gets changed or the mute button is hit.
And the CEO of CBS
said that Trump was great for ratings, terrible for the country. Or
something to that effect. I'll have to dig it up from FAIR.org.
Yes, the Internet has become our collective memory. Until someone
edits and changes it.
And the newspapers
have no one to blame for their demise but themselves. Rather than
cover stories that matter to the working class – the largest
segment of the population – and tell them the truth about what has
happened and why it happened, it focuses on crime, accidents, and
other trivial matters that entertain but never educate about what is
going on and why.
The 2007 economic
crash and crisis was covered horribly. The press did a horrible job
of explaining the causes of it – the repeal of the Glass-Steagle
Act, Wall Street ratings agencies failing to do their job in
investigating the quality of a stock and rating it accordingly, and
other libertarian economic deregulation that just don't work. They
sound nice in theory. In reality – look at the Gilded Age. That's
where they would send us. That's where we are not far from actually.
And journalist jobs
have been hacked and slashed from newspapers offices, so they don't
have the time to do the deep digging that democracy requires in order
to function. The great muckrakers of the late 1800's and early
1900's must be spinning in their graves about the state of journalism
today. Yes, every once in a while so great muckraking does happen,
but those are the exceptions and they are few and far between in
local papers.
And the Internet –
Twitter, Facebook, and other forms of social media – don't make up
the slack. Granted, there are some great social media groups that
do excellent work in exposing things that those in power don't want
people to know about. But, and that's a big but, if you are not
aware of those organization, it is like a tree falling in the
forest. Does it really make a sound?
And Buffalo is a one
newspaper town. Wasn't capitalism dependent upon competition? Body
builders that I know tell me that opposition builds strength, That's
why they use weights. Where's the opposition to the Buffalo News?
Maybe that's why it is such a milquetoast product. (Please –
ignore Carl Paladino just once. Get an opinion from someone else and
dare to say he is boring and predictable.)
Thomas Jefferson
stated that he'd rather have newspapers without government than
government without newspapers. Well, we really don't have any
newspapers and the ones we have are owned by the people we should be
investigating. Or the friends of the people we should be
investigating. Don't get me started on the government, or lack
thereof that we have.
The Buffalo News has
joined Politifact to check on the claims of politician during this
election season. It will be interesting to see if this collaboration
continues after the election is over. It is an interesting idea to
have an organization looking into the claims of politicians and those
that aspire to power.
I would like to see
an EconoFact – an organization that checks into the claims of the
unelected powerful – the barons of industry and Wall Street. Are
the economists, Wall Street, businessmen (and women) telling us the
truth or are they just spouting garbage? We probably won't see that
because newspapers are dependent upon advertising from those very
people that they would be investigating. And we all know how money
talks.
So, people turn to
comedians to find out what is going on.
And people laughed at the
John Oliver skit.
They should have
been crying.
No comments:
Post a Comment