In an op-ed today
(11.30.2015) in the Buffalo News I read the most ludicrous idea that I have ever had to
deal with recently (aside from any of the ideas that some of my
students provide). Given that Buffalo has had NO measurable snowfall
this year so far (that means .10 in. or more), and how warm it has
been, the crazy storms and weather that we have been having across
the country (and world for that matter), and the severe drought that
California is in, the writer has the audacity (or balls, if you
prefer that term) to advise that we keep burning fossil fuels as it
is the only way progress can happen.
I think he is either
from Colorado or one of the states where they have legalized
marijuana use, or must be using something far more potent to be as
oblivious as he is to the ecological damage that is going on. The
droughts in Africa with the resulting refugee crisis that follows ;
the Class 4 and 5 hurricanes and typhoons that have been in the news
in the last 5 years ; the “once in a century storms that have hit
how many times this century? No to mention the rising sea levels that
are wiping out island nations and decimating coastlines.
Even the Pentagon
admits that global warming and climate change are the biggest
security threats to the United States. Not Daesh or any other
terrorist organization. Not Russia or China. Global warming and
climate change.
Seriously, what
drugs is this guy taking?
The best compromise
is limiting the temperature rise to 2°
Celsius. To prevent island nations, like Tuvalu, Micronesia, parts
of the Philippines and Indonesia,
the Netherlands among
other countries from being wiped off the map, 1.5°
Celsius is needed. Even less if we don't want to see NYC, New
Orleans, London, Venice, and other global cities wiped off the map.
If
we want to address the refugee crisis in Africa and the Middle East,
global warming must be addressed. There is no other choice.
Finding
a more environmentally friendly way to burn oil, wood, and coal will
do nothing to address the environmental crisis that we are facing
every year. When California's fire fighting season goes from January
to December, there is a problem. When
the mid-west is so parched for water that corn in August isn't even a
foot tall, there is a problem. When Buffalo has no snow in
November, there is a problem. (I'm sounding like Jeff Foxworthy
here. That is a problem. BTW – come up with some of your own
lines.)
The
better life that the writer thinks that people in Africa, China, and
other 2nd
and 3rd
world countries would be denied because fossil fuels are not being
used to produce electricity is bogus. Many of the people in 2nd
& 3rd
world countries are living in desperation because of 1st
world countries' arrogance, imperialism, and neo-colonial attitudes
and actions. I'm sure many of those people would rather be living on
the small farms that they had, growing subsistence food and getting
by rather than the abject poverty that they are living in right now living in slums outside of cities. I think that they could be living much better with native foods and organic farming, but that is another post for another day as well.
Let's
get those people back on their lands, growing their own food and
generating electricity with solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal energy
sources. Energy sources that will not kill the environment that they
live in. My sister is heating her house with geothermal and stays
plenty warm just outside of Syracuse, NY (who beats Buffalo in snow
every year. Count your blessings, unless you are a ski resort owner
or like snow sports.) Up in Northern New York is a camp that heats
their water, using solar panels, to 160° Fahrenheit. They have to add
cold water to it or people will get scalded. This is on cloudy days
and in winter.
And
we need to burn fossil fuels because?
And
yes, this response was typed up with a computer that has plastic
that probably came from oil. So what? It could have come a plant as
well and been just as durable.
The
op-ed is so full of crap that it could be spread over the Sahara
Desert and turn it into the Garden of Eden.
As
socialists, we demand from Paris:
-
1.5° or less (the less the better)
-
Plans to convert to 75% or more green energy by 2030
-
Complete green energy conversion by 2050
We
need to:
-
Keep the oil in the soil
-
Tar Sands in the land
-
Coal down in the shoals
-
Gas below the grass
-
No nukes
That
is the only moral imperative that we have.
To
give our children a planet that we would want to inherit.
Humanity's
future depends
upon it.
No comments:
Post a Comment