As I catch up on
life after being down and out for a week (combination of things) I am
commenting on articles & news that I saw and heard that stuck in
my mind.
One article was the
statement that Gov. “Status” Cuomo was going to come up with a
way to provide a college education to prisoners – 500 to be exact –
because it would help reduce recidivism.
Good idea – or so
it sounds. Or until you realize that there are over 50,000 people in
prison in NYS. Ten percent of that is 5,000. So, 500 is really just
1% of the total.
What about the rest?
What will be offered to them?
We need to ask
ourselves a number of questions about prisons.
What is the purpose
of prison? Is it supposed to be punishment or rehabilitative? There
are people that prison ruins. And then there are people that should
be (or need to be) in prison because they are that dangerous.
(Pr-meditated murder, the bankers responsible for the economic crash,
etc.)
Next question: How
many of the 50,000 that are in prison would be better served by
social workers or counselors (drug, alcohol, other types) rather than
prison? That would certainly save us taxpayers money. Will we see
that reform put into place? Or will we still be stuck with the bill
for imprisoning people that don't need to be there?
Next Question: How
many are of the mentally ill / mentally disabled and should have been
in group homes or other associated care facilities instead of being
out on the streets? Thank you President (sick) Ronald Reagan for
that mess. No money saved there. Just an appearance.
Next question: How
many of these people would not be in school if NYS (and the US)
actually had schools that served students' needs and interests rather
than this test and punish regime that we now have in place? (No
thank you President (sic) George W Bush.)
All that being said,
Gov. Cuomo rolled this out as part of a talk on “Community
Schools.” This sounded to me like a back door plan to privatize
schools. These schools would only be created in communities with
schools that are failing. The school would be put into
“receivership” (controlled by an outside entity, basically
privatized) and then social services and other public services would
be brought in. Why bother with the privatization? Bring in those
services now! The students, their families, and their communities
need them. Now. Can the politics and do what everybody knows is
needed.
However, there was
no talk about ending the collective punishment of teachers and
students (standardized testing) which has been shown to drive down
educational achievement and interest in learning. This drives down
the long term possibility that our economy will recover.
There have been
complaints about Gov. Coumo providing this money for the prisons but
doing nothing for the rising tuition in the SUNY (public) college
system. We can solve that problem by eliminating the college sports
programs. In earlier blog posts I demonstrated how most of a
student's tuition went to the sporting program instead of towards the
actual education of the students. The funding problem for that is
solved easily – Let the professional teams sponsor the college
level programs like farm teams. (Think the Buffalo Bisons, et al.)
There is no need for college professors to be struggling to support
the programs that actually drive our economy while college sports
coaches make more money than the college president. (For that
matter, cut the salary of the college president. Is he teaching?
No? Enough said. Current UB President Tripathi, with no
experience, received more than double his predecessor. Read that
twice and wonder why.)
Yes, Gov. Cuomo has
a good idea to introduce more education to the prison system in order
to reduce the size and scope of it. This is whacking at the leaves
of the tree rather than striking at the roots of the problem.
I know that I can go
into more on the need of capitalism to imprison the unemployed and a
whole slew of other issues.
We all know the
problems of prisons and prisoners.
Why doesn't the
governor do more?
Then again, we need
to ask the question – Who does he really represent?
No comments:
Post a Comment