The NYS Department
of Agriculture has a problem with Wheatfield.
They don't like the
ban on biosolids that the town has imposed.
So the Department
struck it down because they claim the law unreasonably restricts
farmers in their use of “legal” fertilizers.
Note the word in
quotes: legal.
Legal does not mean
safe.
A refresher:
biosolids are created by using human created sewage and anaerobic
digesters. The digesters are used to create methane (a highly
dangerous greenhouse gas) and leaves the biosolids as a byproduct.
Well, the companies
that create this waste want to do something with it, so they claim
that human waste is no different than animal waste when it comes to
using it as fertilizer.
Except for the fact
that the human waste is loaded with all sorts of drugs and chemicals
that cows, pigs, chickens, and other farm animals don't ingest.
I worked on a farm
in high school. We never gave cows birth control pills, erectile
dysfunction drugs, anti-depressants, aspirin, acetaminophen, or any
other pain medication. Or any of a host of medications that humans
take.
And yet the waste is
supposed to be equivalent and OK to use.
To that I (and the
people of Wheatfield) say “Bull$#!+.”
The farm that wants
to use the waste sounds like a CAFO: a contained animal feeding
operation. For those not in the know, this is a factory farm where
the animals spend their entire day in a stall and are fed very
expensive to grow GMO corn, alfalfa, and of course the ever being cut
grass and hay.
Simply put, this a
group of farmers that bought into the capitalist lie about how to run
their farms (against the laws of common sense) and are now seriously
in debt and have to do something to pay off all the money they owe.
So they want to use cheap crap as fertilizer without regard for the
consequences to their herd or their customers.
I could go off more
on CAFOs but there are plenty of good films and organizations that do
a much better job than I do.
This law is an
environmental law and not a law on farming, as the Department of
Agriculture weakly notes. As this crap is spread onto the fields,
can the farmers guarantee that the biolsolids will not wash onto
other farmers' land or onto adjacent properties? Can the farmers
guarantee that the biosolids will not wash into local streams and
wind up in Lake Ontario?
The answer to this
is “No.”
So therefore,
because the manufacturing firm can not guarantee that their product,
the biosolds, can not be contained to the property that it is being
used on, it should not be used at all.
I know farmers that
do not spread manure around the streams on or near their property
because they do not want the waste to wash into them. (Know that
algae bloom in Lake Erie? Farm run off is the #1 contributor to it.)
Responsible farms
know to do this and know to use only what is safe.
The firms that
manufacture biosolids do not like their product to be tested because
they are afraid that it will be deemed unsafe.
Well, maybe it is
and we, the people that have to live with the consequences of their
decisions, don't want unsafe products or practices around our homes.
If they want to
prove it safe: The owners of the firms can use it on their
properties first and only eat foods grown on (or in) it.
Somehow I doubt they
will go for that.
And neither should
we.
Growing Food in Human and Industrial Waste must stop! More scientists join outcry against land-applied sewer sludge (aka biosolids) See - http://bit.ly/1sb2qOP and http://bit.ly/20Dz4U5
ReplyDeleteLike the term "sewer sludge" - it's more accurate.
DeleteI will read those links.
Anything that helps Wheatfield win is good