Translate

Wednesday, June 15, 2016

Biosolids Battle


The NYS Department of Agriculture has a problem with Wheatfield.

They don't like the ban on biosolids that the town has imposed.

So the Department struck it down because they claim the law unreasonably restricts farmers in their use of “legal” fertilizers.

Note the word in quotes: legal.
Legal does not mean safe.

A refresher: biosolids are created by using human created sewage and anaerobic digesters. The digesters are used to create methane (a highly dangerous greenhouse gas) and leaves the biosolids as a byproduct.

Well, the companies that create this waste want to do something with it, so they claim that human waste is no different than animal waste when it comes to using it as fertilizer.

Except for the fact that the human waste is loaded with all sorts of drugs and chemicals that cows, pigs, chickens, and other farm animals don't ingest.

I worked on a farm in high school. We never gave cows birth control pills, erectile dysfunction drugs, anti-depressants, aspirin, acetaminophen, or any other pain medication. Or any of a host of medications that humans take.

And yet the waste is supposed to be equivalent and OK to use.

To that I (and the people of Wheatfield) say “Bull$#!+.”

The farm that wants to use the waste sounds like a CAFO: a contained animal feeding operation. For those not in the know, this is a factory farm where the animals spend their entire day in a stall and are fed very expensive to grow GMO corn, alfalfa, and of course the ever being cut grass and hay.

Simply put, this a group of farmers that bought into the capitalist lie about how to run their farms (against the laws of common sense) and are now seriously in debt and have to do something to pay off all the money they owe. So they want to use cheap crap as fertilizer without regard for the consequences to their herd or their customers.

I could go off more on CAFOs but there are plenty of good films and organizations that do a much better job than I do.

This law is an environmental law and not a law on farming, as the Department of Agriculture weakly notes. As this crap is spread onto the fields, can the farmers guarantee that the biolsolids will not wash onto other farmers' land or onto adjacent properties? Can the farmers guarantee that the biosolids will not wash into local streams and wind up in Lake Ontario?

The answer to this is “No.”

So therefore, because the manufacturing firm can not guarantee that their product, the biosolds, can not be contained to the property that it is being used on, it should not be used at all.

I know farmers that do not spread manure around the streams on or near their property because they do not want the waste to wash into them. (Know that algae bloom in Lake Erie? Farm run off is the #1 contributor to it.)

Responsible farms know to do this and know to use only what is safe.

The firms that manufacture biosolids do not like their product to be tested because they are afraid that it will be deemed unsafe.

Well, maybe it is and we, the people that have to live with the consequences of their decisions, don't want unsafe products or practices around our homes.

If they want to prove it safe: The owners of the firms can use it on their properties first and only eat foods grown on (or in) it.

Somehow I doubt they will go for that.

And neither should we.

2 comments:

  1. Growing Food in Human and Industrial Waste must stop! More scientists join outcry against land-applied sewer sludge (aka biosolids) See - http://bit.ly/1sb2qOP and http://bit.ly/20Dz4U5

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Like the term "sewer sludge" - it's more accurate.
      I will read those links.

      Anything that helps Wheatfield win is good

      Delete