The Buffalo News
periodically publishes an article that spells out a truth that the
public needs to know about but doesn't grasp. Even after reading the
article.
The article in
question brought up the issue of Republican control over the NY
Senate even though Democrats outnumber Republicans in the state by
nearly a 2 to 1 advantage. The article soes not tell us the number
of registered voters, or those registered outside of those two
parties.
So how does a small
group of people seize control over the state government and its
agenda in the face of a potential majority opposition?
Gerrymandering.
It's that simple.
The corporate leadership of the Republican Party have a better grasp
on Leninism, the concept of a vanguard party, and the works of Saul
Alinsky than the Democrats and the left opposition do. And because
of that they know how to game the system so that they can control the
state government during the census years when the redistricting of
the state must occur.
Because they know
all this and (more importantly) do it – they control the fate of
the state, for better or ( or more likely) worse.
And the same
corporate controllers that own the Republican Party also donate
heavily to the Democratic Party, so it is very unlikely that they
will ever mount any sort of opposition to the status quo.
So how do we break
this lock on power that the corporate controlled powers that be have?
We force a vote on
proportional representation and keep pushing the issue until they
relent.
It's a very simple
concept. If a party reaches a certain threshold of voters – 5% is
the standard that I have seen across Europe and I believe that Canada
uses the same standard – they receive that percentage of
representation in the government. This could be both in the Assembly
and Senate. Though I see no reason why we would need both chambers
under this system.
This would open the
doors to the alternatives to the two corporate parties and the third
parties could run their own candidates rather than being stuck
endorsing the two major parties and hoping to get them to listen to
anything the third parties say. (I'm thinking of the Working
Families Party and Conservative Party. Both are basically additional
lines for the Democrats and Republicans respectively.)
This would help
break the corporate hold on power because there would be too many
parties to control. The Republicans would not only have to
campaign against the left, they would have to deal with the
Constitution Party and those pesky Libertarians that don't exactly
fit into the conservative mold but fit into the smaller government is
better routine.
The Democrats would
have to deal with the Republicans and their ilk and also deal with
the Green Party and the various socialist parties that we have here
in NY. So the lock that they have on the left would be broken and
people that are tired of the Democrats making promises and failing to
keep them would have somewhere else to turn to.
And yes, it would
be messy during the election season.
But I would not call
the discussion of the various ideas a mess.
It's actually called
“democracy.”
And I think we could
use some about now.
No comments:
Post a Comment