Commissioner Elia
unveiled changes to the testing that students will be facing this
March, April, and May. She claims that these tests will be better.
I personally doubt it.
First: A new
company will be handling the tests. Pearson (owned by a British
Company) is , for the most part, out and a new organization, Questar
Assessment, is in. Two words. Big deal. The questions are still
Pearson's questions. It's just the organization responsible for
administering the tests is different. The students are being tested.
Second: There will
be fewer questions (with the same amount of time) so that students
will have more time to answer the questions. From the viewpoint of
someone that proctors these exams – this means absolutely nothing.
I've watched students blow through the exam (taking them seriously)
in 30 minutes. The students are still taking an exam that they either
stress out over or don't care about at all. Two words: Big deal.
Third: The
Commissioner wants to reduce the number of days being tested next
year. If she's not reducing them to zero, then you can guess my
answer to her statement.
Fourth: Teachers
are supposedly collaborating with Questar to make sure the questions
are correctly constructed and appropriate. No questions with multiple
answers or confusing questions. Like the pineapple question.
Teachers need to boycott this activity. It gives legitimacy to the
tests and to testing. It will eventually comeback to bite them in
2019 when test scores become part of the teacher evaluation process
again. Plain and simple – no collaboration and no testing.
The problem with
testing – There is no proof that it shows what the students know or
are capable of. The so called “Texas Miracle” was found to be a
hoax. Students that were performing poorly on the exams were
dropping out of school and pursuing GEDs (Graduate Equivalence
Diplomas). These students were typically the under-performing and
low achieving students. Basically the minorities and the poor. What
was left behind was the higher achieving students. Any
mathematician will tell you that an average will rise when lower
numbers are cut out of the equation. That is what happened in Texas.
The way No Child Left Behind was written, drop-outs count against the failure rate –
thus the “Texas miracle” can not be repeated.
Furthermore, test
results are not available until summertime – after students have
either been promoted or failed, so there is no way for teachers to
use the data in an effective manner .
My favorite one
comes from an ELA (English Language Arts) teacher that basically
taught her students how to take the test. I was told that for many
questions that the students had to (literally) copy from the text
word for word what was written. There was no interpretation or
anything involved. Read and regurgitate. This is learning?
That is an insult
and a waste of taxpayers' money and teachers and students' time.
Socialists demand an
end to useless testing that turns students off from learning and
turns teachers away from teaching.
That and a refund of
all the money that has been wasted on all these useless tests.
We'll never get back
the time or opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment