Count me among the
confused.
One minute the State
Education Dept. has 10 schools ready to be placed under the
receivership of Superintendent Kriner Cash. He can void the union
contract, move teachers around, extend the school day, and do whatever he “needs to do”
in order to improve test scores and graduation rates.
The next minute,
the schools are doing OK. Test scores are improving and graduation
rates are going up, so here's some extra money and keep up the good
work. Next year there won't be any extra money, but we'll give you
some for now.
What?
So I have an
appointment scheduled with a chiropractor to deal with a severe case
of whiplash that I received.
And I'm evidently
not the only one.
Assemblyman Mickey
Kearns is just as confused as I am. And he's in government. He
voted against the receivership law because he thought it was poorly
thought out and too confusing. (He was correct on that.)
School board member
Barbara Seals-Nevergold is a strong critic of the receivership law
and appears to be equally as flummoxed. (Look it up in the
dictionary.)
The Buffalo Teachers
Federation is also a little in shock over this decision. They are
going to press forward with their lawsuit to get the law stopped.
Probably while scratching their heads.
Evidently,
according to the law, schools need to be deemed persistently
struggling for at least three years. For the next two years they
receive extra funding from the state and have to submit turnaround
plans and follow them and if improvement is not achieved quickly
enough, the school can be privatized.
What about after the
improvement is achieved? The money goes away and …. the programs
that made the success possible get cut? And then achievement goes
down and we begin the cycle all over again?
Something about this
law screams “stupid” at the top of its lungs.
Was anyone paying
attention the last three years to these schools?
Or were they
flapping their gums about how poor the schools were doing without
examining the evidence?
Superintendent Cash
said that he has no plans to take his foot off the pedal of progress.
Perhaps he should
take it out of his mouth first?
No comments:
Post a Comment